Rebecca Carley, M.D.
Infowars
June 28, 2009

“One basic truth can be used as a foundation for a mountain of lies, and if we dig down deep enough in the mountain of lies, and bring out that truth, to set it on top of the mountain of lies; the entire mountain of lies will crumble under the weight of that one truth. And there is nothing more devastating to a structure of lies than the revelation of the truth upon which the structure of lies was built, because the shock waves of the revelation of the truth reverberate, and continue to reverberate throughout the Earth for generations to follow, awakening even those people who had no desire to be awakened to the truth.” (by Delamar Duvaris as written in the preface of “Behold the Pale Horse” by William Cooper).

The basic truth that served as the foundation for the mountain of lies known as vaccinations was the observation that mammals who recover from infection with microorganisms acquire natural immunity from further infections. Whenever T cells (the little packman cells which kill viruses, bacteria, and cancer cells, thus conferring cellular immunity) and B cells (antibody producing cells which confer humoral immunity) are activated by various substances foreign to the body called antigens, some of the T and B cells become memory cells. Thus, the next time the individual meets up with that same antigen, the immune system can be quickly triggered to demolish it. This is the process known as immunity.

This truth gave birth to a beLIEf that if a foreign antigen was injected into an individual, that individual would then become immune to a future infection. This beLIEf, (you see the lie in the middle), was given the name, “vaccinations”. What the promoters of vaccination failed to realize is that the respiratory tract of ALL mammals (since animals are just as devastated by these inoculations with disease as are humans) contain secretory IgA (an antibody which initiates the natural God given immune response) within the respiratory tract mucosa. Bypassing this mucosal aspect of the immune system by directly injecting organisms into the bloodstream leads to a corruption in the immune system itself. As a result, the pathogenic viruses or bacteria cannot be eliminated by the immune system and remain in the body, where they will further grow and/or mutate as the individual is exposed to ever more antigens and toxins in the environment which continue to assault the immune system.

The mechanism by which the immune system is corrupted can best be realized when you understand that the two poles of the immune system (the cellular and humoral mechanisms) have a reciprocal relationship. Thus, when one is stimulated, the other is inhibited. Since vaccines activate the B cells to secrete antibody, the T cells are subsequently suppressed. This suppression of the cell mediated response is a key factor in the development of cancer and life threatening infections. In fact, the “prevention” of a disease via vaccination is, in reality, an inability to expel organisms due to the suppression of the cell-mediated response.

Dr Ilya Sandra Perlingieri warns on the dangerous of the H1N1 bioweapon vaccine

By birdflu666

Jeff Rense has posted up this report from Dr Ilya Sandra Perlingieri on the dangers of the H1N1 vaccines classified as bioweapons by the governments own definition.

Dangers In The Shots – Components
Of H1N1 Vaccines
They are considered a biodefense agents.
By Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri
© Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri – All Rights Reserved
8-4-9

PART 1.

Please NOTE: As of August 1, 2009, no long-term, independent safety trial studies have been done for any of the different and new flu vaccines that are supposed to be given/forced on all Americans ­whether we want them or not. , After the World Health Organization [WHO] declared a Level 6 “pandemic” on June 11, the US government has mandated that all Americans over the age of six months be vaccinated. Although WHO cannot technically interfere with the internal laws of the US, they can and already have put enormous pressure on our government (and, thereby, our own laws) to require all citizens to get these toxic vaccine shots. There are to be no exceptions to this new illegal US ruling. Further, WHO is not even tracking the actual number of laboratory confirmed cases of H1N1. So, how can it be called a “pandemic”? This year’s flu is mild.

There has been a tremendous rush (called “fast-tracked”) to get these vaccines on the market. The tests they have done were only a few days to a few weeks long. This is totally insufficient time to determine any realistic, long-term, and potentially hazardous immune responses. Nothing has been done in any responsible manner. There is absolutely no Precautionary Principle (first do no harm) in place. What we have, first and foremost, are both out-of-control greed and scare tactics. These are directed to uninformed citizens, while the international pharmaceutical companies will make billions of dollars, with the very real potential of enormous harm to millions of victims is looming ever closer.

We all are their experimental lab rats. There is no concern about harming or killing anyone, because the companies (GlaxoSmithKline, Baxter, and Novartis, and others) have been indemnified by the government, so that there is absolutely no recourse for any deaths or injuries these vaccines may cause. Why would they do that, if these vaccines were safe? What secret and criminal plans were done behind closed doors to hatch this real X-Files plot? From investigative reports by Jane Burgermeister, Dr. A. True Ott, and Canadian doctor Ghislaine Lanctôt (author of “Medica Mafia”), it appears that there is criminal collusion between officials in the US government, WHO/UN, and the pharmaceutical corporations.(1)

In a call yesterday to a friend who is a doctor in California, she told me ominously: “60% of Americans could die from these vaccines.” Is this what lies ahead for us in the next few months? 12,000 children ages 3-12, will be guinea pigs for these flu vaccines. It is unethical and unconscionable. To possibly rig the results, the children will be getting injections of different vaccines than will be delivered to the rest of the population this Fall. Is this the cesspool that is hijacking our country? Do we all go ­lost in our daily routines, refusing to wake to the grave consequences that face us!– merrily down a path leading to such Orwellian destruction?

Here are some historical reminders of past flu epidemics. They were all contrived and created in some hidden laboratory.

Dr. Mercola's Comments:

It is a modern-day tragedy that millions of women in the U.S. have been scared by Merck’s powerful ad campaign to become “one less” victim to cervical cancer by getting vaccinated with Gardasil. Sadly, now an increasing number of formerly healthy girls are turning into “one more” victim of vaccine adverse reactions.

There have been a total of 47 deaths linked to Gardasil since it was brought to market in 2006, according to a press release issued by Judicial Watch, which says it has obtained records from the FDA. In 2008 alone 28 women and girls died after receiving Gardasil injections (up from 19 deaths in 2007).

In all the FDA documented 6,723 adverse events related to Gardasil in 2008, of which 1,061 were considered "serious," and 142 considered "life threatening,” the group reported.

Further, as Barbara Loe Fisher reported, by the summer of 2009 Gardasil had already caused more than 15,000 reports of vaccine reactions, including more than 3,000 injuries and 48 deaths.

However, it’s estimated that only between 1 percent and 10 percent of vaccine adverse events are ever reported, which means there could actually be anywhere from 150,000 to 1.5 million vaccine injuries related to Gardasil.

Get the Facts, Not the Fear

Merck has convinced millions of girls to get vaccinated with Gardasil by instilling in them a fear of the sexually transmitted disease human papilloma virus, or HPV. While it’s true that many women get HPV, and in a small number of cases HPV can progress to cervical cancer, this fear-mongering is only revealing a select assortment of facts.

Merck would like you to hear that 6 million women contract HPV annually -- but they do not tell you that most of those cases are harmless. Your body can clear up HPV on its own, and does so more than 90 percent of the time!

At least 50 percent of sexually active men and women acquire genital HPV infection at some point in their lives, according to the National Prevention Information Network (NPIN). Most often, the infection causes no symptoms at all, and is easily cleared up by your immune system.

Even the National Cancer Institute says:

"It is important to note, however, that the great majority of high-risk HPV infections go away on their own and do not cause cancer."

In some cases the infection can result in genital warts, and much less often, cervical and other genital cancers. But cervical cancer actually claims less than 3,900 women a year -- most of which are due to not getting regular Pap smears.

So before you even think about getting vaccinated with Gardasil (or having your daughter vaccinated), realize that it’s for a virus that clears up on its own 90 percent of the time.

Cervical Cancer Vaccine

A vaccine that is claimed to prevent cancer is causing damage that is a precursor to cancer?

Bronwyn Hancock 20 August 2007
Updated 26 July 2008

In due course I will be writing an article about this vaccine, but in the meantime I refer you to this site that has plenty of information including many articles written by others: http://www.visainfo.org.au/

But in addition, just before you go to that other site, here is some very significant information, that has been brought to my knowledge by the discoverer of it:

Naturopath and Iridologist Michael Blake, of Natures Cure Pty Ltd in Dandenong, Melbourne (web site http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/6025) is very concerned at what he has seen in the irises of four girls recently and his conscience will not allow him to stay silent.

In the area of the iris that corresponds to the uterus, in three of the girls he saw tissue damage, and in the fourth he saw drug residue. In each of the four cases, on reporting back to the patient what he was observing, he was informed that the girl had recently received the cervical cancer vaccine. All were virgins.

Serious Adverse Reactions To Gardasil Swept Under Carpet

 By Dr Nikki Turner of NZ’s Immunization Advisory Centre

Gardasil Vaccine
On the 24th of February, Dr Nikki Turner of the Immunisation Advisory Centre gave a presentation about Gardasil to 28 members of the public in Whangarei at the Forum North events centre.   Although people were advised by The Whangarei Report that this meeting was to help them become informed, in my opinion, it was designed to do anything but.  The public were treated like mushrooms by Dr Turner – they were fed manure and kept in the dark.
At the start of the meeting Dr Turner was asked for clarification on whose data she was presenting and when she stated that it was derived from Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil,  I advised that a whistleblower who had worked for Merck had indicated that their research data on the HPV vaccine was not trustworthy.  While Dr Turner did not dismiss this claim, she did not seem particularly concerned and moved back to the presentation.
On the topic of warts Dr Turner mentioned that Gardasil was useful in preventing these.  When I questioned her about the reports of people getting warts as a result of having the vaccine, she denied that this was occurring and implied the media had misled the public.   The media has not.  Here are 3 excerpts published on pages 4 and 5 of a Judicial Watch report on the Gardasil vaccine that link shots to the subsequent development of warts:
Two days after receiving the first dose of Gardasil, the patient developed groin warts. There is no known history of these warts. The patient came back in about a month later and was given the second dose of Gardasil.
days after receiving the second dose, the patient had a huge outbreak of warts.   VAERS ID: 292052-1

Cynthia A. Janak column
HPV emergency medical alert


Cynthia A. Janak
Cynthia A. Janak
September 30, 2009

Since February of 2007 I have researched the HPV vaccines extensively. I have learned so much during this time. Well, my most recent research has caused me to issue this warning. Let me show you how I came to my conclusions.

On August 7th of this year I referenced a study from Finland on HPV and its transmission to infants. In that study 7.9% of the families the mother and father were HPV negative but the baby was HPV positive. Another interesting fact is that only 2.6% of the families were totally HPV negative. What this told me is that in 97.4% of the families someone was HPV positive. This study also informed me to the fact that this is not a sexually transmitted disease. HPV is transmitted by casual contact.

Let us look at two diseases that are also transmitted by casual contact. I am going to reference events that happened when I was a young girl.

In the neighborhood where I grew up when one of the children on the block had the chicken pox that parent let all the other parents in the neighborhood know and we had a chicken pox party. I got the chicken pox because of such a party and I am fine. When I became a mom I found out through my pediatrician that my children would be the most contagious when they have the little blisters. This is because those blisters will pop and chicken pox can be transmitted by casual contact.

Another thing in my neighborhood was the measles parties. The same thing would happen and the neighborhood moms would get their children together who never had the measles. My brother went to such a party and came home and gave me the measles. I survived that too without any long term side effects except lifelong immunity. Again, when I was a mom I found out that measles was a casual contact virus.

In the HPV vaccines we have VLPs (virus like particles). These VLPs are for HPV 6, 11, 16 & 18. HPV 6 and 11 are mainly for warts. HPV 16 & 18 are mainly for cervical lesions that could lead to cervical cancer.

To prove that the HPV is a casual contact virus I am going to reference what I found in the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System).

 BY CYNTHIA A. JANAK

30 September 09

There are now 51 REPORTED DEATHS linked to Gardasil

One of the things that you will notice when you read many of the reports is that these girls reported abdominal pain. This is important because on the autopsy report that was sent to me it reported "Pelvic Congestion." So, of course, I had to look that up. What I found got me really upset.

I found this on newswise.

http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/510640

About Pelvic Congestion

The causes of chronic pelvic pain are varied, but are often associated with the presence of ovarian and pelvic varicose veins. Pelvic congestion syndrome is similar to varicose veins in the legs. In both cases, the valves in the veins that help return blood to the heart against gravity become weakened and don't close properly; this allows blood to flow backwards and pool in the vein causing pressure and bulging veins. In the pelvis, varicose veins can cause pain and affect the uterus, ovaries and vulva.

Pelvic congestion syndrome is more common in women who have not been pregnant because ovarian veins increase in size related to previous pregnancies; however, in this study, 63 percent had not had children. Fullness of leg veins, polycystic ovaries and hormonal dysfunction are additional risk factors for developing pelvic congestion syndrome.

Diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome is often missed because women lie down for a pelvic exam, relieving pressure from the ovarian veins, so that the veins no longer bulge with blood as they do while a woman is standing.

If you go through those VAERS reports you will find numerous reports of abdominal pain that is being shrugged off as "it is all in your head." There are now many girls that have been diagnosed with PCOS and cysts on the ovaries. With many, many more with hormonal dysfunction like pre-menopausal like symptoms.

Now on to HPV 16 and 18. This news was reported to me in just the last two weeks. I am going to quote an email that I received from a distraught mother. The one thing I want you to understand is that the two girls mentioned in the email did not suffer any side- effects after receiving all three shots. NO SIDE EFFECTS

Tue September 08, 2009 @ 05:03 PM *********

My oldest received her 3 shot series when she was 18, 3 years ago — no problems with the injections.

Here is why I am now worried. Her older sister, who had the complete series, called me in hysterics this morning after getting a call from her campus Wellness Center. They told her that her pap showed a high number of lesions and she is going in for a COPO on Friday.
(biopsy of the lesions)

They were unaware that she had under gone the Gardasil series. I called the center and spoke to the nurse for the details. The nurse told me another girl approximately the same age as my daughter and having had the Gardasil series at the same age was in this week with the same issue. She, too, will be undergoing the same diagnostic treatment as my daughter.

Dr Richard Halvorsen: I'm not opposed to jabs but there are serious worries

By Dr Richard Halvorsen
Last updated at 2:38 AM on 01st October 2009

Evangelists for mass vaccination like to claim that these programmes are of universal benefit to public health. Indeed, so zealous is their enthusiasm for vaccines that, through a cocktail of scaremongering and propaganda, they attempt to suppress all debate.

The result is that people, especially parents, feel bullied or patronised if they dare to challenge the official drive to vaccinate against every possible risk of disease. Moreover, this climate of fear is ruthlessly exploited by the big pharmaceutical companies, which see vast profits in exaggerated health concerns.

Yet the sudden death of Coventry schoolgirl Natalie Morton after a jab against cervical cancer highlights the reality that vaccination programmes are not without their risks.

Additional information