For all you PRO VACCINE people: if there is only one thing you would be willing to read in regards to vaccines this should be it

by "Angela King" on Monday, 29 November 2010 at 10:17

This is the argument that keeps me up at night. This is the mentality that fried my baby's brain. This is the rationale behind a vaccine program that is out of control, completely corrupt, and responsible for damaging millions and millions of lives. As long as the belief is that those damaged millions are justification for the billions, it's okay. As Angelina Jolie says in her summer movie Wanted,  Kill one. Save a thousand.  But what about when that "one" is yours? When that "one" could have and should have been saved? When that "one" turns out not to be "one" but an entire generation of children across the globe? Well, that's when I get angry. I have yet to meet one parent of a vaccine injured child, or a vaccine injured person, who is okay with what happened because they take comfort in knowing their sacrifice was for the greater good. The only people who believe they should are those that have the luxury of not having made a sacrifice, and worse, believe that sacrifice somehow made them safer. Only they don't even believe they have to say thank you to those of us that lost. They believe they were entitled to it. To any and all who may feel that way, let me make this clear: You were never entitled to my child's life, and I never had any intention of giving it to you.


 

AND here's a quote for you.....

Who are you to judge the life I live? I know I'm not perfect and I don't live to be. But before you start pointing fingers...make sure your hands are clean.

 -Bob Marley


 

You made the statement to me the other night.  "I know something happened to your son with vaccines but I'm pro vaccine and they save lives."

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Winston Salem, North Carolina, United States of America (Free-Press-Release.com) December 9, 2010 --
According to FDA rules, in order to obtain ‘fast-track’ approval a new drug or medical treatment, two criteria must be satisfied. The drug/treatment must be for a serious disease and it must fill an unmet medical need. According to the FDA, filling an ‘unmet medical need’ is defined as, “providing a therapy where none exists or providing a therapy which may be potentially superior to existing therapy.”


There is no doubt cervical cancer is a serious disease. However, one has to question how Gardasil met the second criteria of filling an ‘unmet’ medical need. Due to regular cervical cancer screening and appropriate medical follow-up when abnormal cervical cells are detected, cervical cancer rates in the United States have dropped over 74% and continue to decline. This is the case in most developed countries around the world. So, where is the ‘unmet medical need?’

Another problem arises when HPV is purported to be a cause of cervical cancer. Several high-risk genotypes of human papillomavirus (HPV) have been associated with cervical cancer, but not established as a cause of cancer. Persistent HPV infections occurring from the same genotype, increase the risk of cancer. No one has determined whether or not persistent infections actually cause cancer without other risk factors being present.


The truth is 90% of all HPV infections clear on their own without medical intervention. Of the 10% left, only 5% of these will ever develop into cancerous cells. Cervical cancer takes between 5 and 15 years to develop. 95% of cervical cancer is treatable and curable. Almost all fatalities from cervical cancer can be avoided with good gynecological care. Again, where is the ‘unmet medical need?’

In addition to these two criteria, FDA guidelines say, if there are existing therapies for the disease a proposed drug/treatment is intended for a fast-track drug must show some advantage over available treatment(s), such as:

1. Showing superior effectiveness – Gardasil will not be able to show that for at least 10-15 years.

2. Avoiding serious side effects – there are no serious side effects to regular screening and appropriate follow-up.

3. Improving the diagnosis of a serious disease where early diagnosis results in an improved outcome – not applicable to HPV vaccines.


4. Decreasing a clinically significant toxicity of an accepted treatment – again, not applicable to HPV vaccines.

 By

Suzanne Humphries, MD

December 6, 2010

It’s fall in the northern hemisphere and more than one type of darkness has set in. Vaccines are being injected at lightning speed. New vaccines, untested vaccines, double-strength flu vaccines for the over 65 group; none of which have been shown to be effective at keeping anyone healthy. The naïve are lining up at clinics, shopping malls, and retail stores. They don’t know which kind of vaccine they will receive. Which manufacturer is it? Does it have mercury? What chemicals does it contain? Why should they care? Why would they not trust their doctor (or their local pharmacist)?

These healthcare professionals say it is a good idea to get a flu vaccine to stay healthy this winter, so they allow disease to be injected into their muscles. The people have been mesmerized, duped and frightened by a bogeyman illness called the flu. Ironically, the real bogeyman – the silent monster that can wreak unrecognized havoc – just slipped beneath their skin, completely unnoticed, and masquerading as something healthy, called a vaccine. Despite any logic or science behind the mass marketing of the flu and pneumonia jabs, these vaccines remain the most recommended solution to preventing disease by the uninformed, propaganda-parroting practitioners.

The people who are getting vaccinated and the practitioners who are pushing vaccines are parishioners of the largest church on earth. They can be very devout and unreasonable. They believe this medical religion, vaccination, has saved millions of lives. They’ve read the holy bible of Merck and believe the mantras of the CDC that vaccines have eradicated disease from the Earth. They must be a gift from some god, right? But what else have these indoctrinated persons in white coats read about vaccines? With few exceptions, precious little. Most who administer these slurries don’t even know what ingredients are in them.

No matter how obvious the true cause of so much human misery becomes – that people are actually being sickened and immunosuppressed by vaccines and drugs – the pharma-faithful can’t see the cause. Here’s why: Doctors are the modern day priests and priestesses, anointing their followers with prescriptions. The priests are infatuated with and addicted to the power endowed to them. They strut about, cock-sure that they were rightly taught the one and only true form of medicine, and they are fulfilling their service to humanity. They have been successfully ordained into the Brotherhood. They have no intentions of doubting or abandoning their programming, even when they witness someone healing without drugs, or being healthy without vaccines. Where would they be if they realized that the earth would be better off without their temples and holy water? They are unintentionally dependent on their devotees’ illnesses and on the system that taught them to spar with disease rather than heal it. The temple of mirrors is filled with smoke, and creates illusions that will keep the sick coming back for more.

France says the award winning advertising campaign for Gardasil is false and misleading. The Sanevax Team wants to know - Where was the press coverage when this happened? Why did no one break the news to the public?
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
Christina England
This has got to stop for the sake of the children. This is propaganda drummed up to sell vaccines. These vaccines are now given to children of both sexes from the age of nine. In the USA alone there has been 20,915 Adverse Events, 370, Abnormal Pap Smears and 89 Deaths reported on the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System VAERS and 5 Deaths uncovered by Judicial Watch, not included in VAERS reports. If you see false advertising of these vaccines in your country please contact the SANE VAX team at http://sanevax.org/ who will look into the matter
 

Posted on January 6, 2011 by RachelB

 

New side effects of the Gardasil vaccine–the drug marketed by Merck to reduce cervical cancer –are being brought to light.
 
Thanks to patient rights groups, the symptoms listed on the drug’s insert, which include fainting, seizures and soreness at the injection site  should have a few more.  With thousands of women suffering side effects after any one of this three shot vaccination series, the truth about this dangerous drug goes beyond cervical cancer and has been linked to a variety of immune reactions including Guillain Barre Syndrome, and idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP) a immune-mediated clotting disorder.

First, medical researchers have presented data that shows that the vaccine is not really any more protective against this common female cancer than regular screenings and PAP smears are.  Merck ran a convincing campaign for the medication which was released to the market in 2006 and advertised to protect against the four most common strains of  human papilloma virus (HPV) a sexually transmitted disease that is known to trigger changes in the cells of the cervix which can lead to cancer.
The drug is marketed for girls between the age of 9 and 26, but very little testing has been conducted on girls younger than 15, and it was released for use without fully understanding its side effects.  Due to struggling sales, Gardasil has recently been approved for use in men and boys to prevent anal cancers, and for women up until age 45.
In the analysis of nine VAERS reports released by the group SANE Vax, specific incidences of the side effect ITP were cited for several women just weeks, or days after vaccination.  ITP appears to be a condition where the body produces antibodies to platelets.  Platelets are a component of the blood that are responsible for sticking together and causing blood to clot normally.  When antibodies form it is a sign that the body is attacking itself.  As a result platelet levels can drop dangerously low and result in bruising, and bleeding from the nose and gums or produce heavy menstrual cycles. Extremely low platelet counts can lead to death from bleeding around the brain, or gastrointestinal bleeding.
Report after report tells the brief, abbreviated stories of something much more difficult to convey on paper.  The life-changing illnesses that state simply, Recovered? NO.  Disabled? YES. So matter of fact, yet the incidences of  ITP just hours or days after Gardasil is not considered to be a severe reaction.  In more than one case, medical doctors who consulted on the patient agreed that the symptoms were in fact caused by the Gardasil vaccine.
Dig deeply for the facts before you roll up your sleeve.  Symptoms and complications abound with the Gardasil vaccine and the information is out there if you know where to look. Certainly every young girl who has been injured by this shot would have loved to know the dangers before theirs.

One More Girl Unveils Truth behind HPV Vaccine Travesty


Documentary Hailed as Social/Political Statement on Marketing of Global Medical Experiments

January 11, 2011. Honolulu HI.  Ryan Richardson and brother, David, announce the debut of a special preview of their new documentary, One More Girl  

This provocative film documents the stories of the numerous girls adversely affected by the HPV vaccines – giving these young women and their families a chance to speak out – share their dismay and sense of betrayal for simply believing the pharmaceutical and medical industries were protecting them when marketing HPV vaccines for the prevention of cervical cancer.  Filled with stories of anguish, loss of innocence, guilt on the part of mothers who encouraged their daughter’s to get the vaccine – and financial devastation as families use their hard-earned savings to find a cure for their daughter’s illness, leaving no viewer untouched.  Interviews with mothers whose daughters lost their lives after receiving the vaccine bring tears to your eyes – raising the question of how the marketing of a medical experiment got by the world’s health regulatory agencies.

Donielle Richardson, 18 year old sister of the Richardson brothers was also adversely injured by Gardasil and it was her adverse reaction and long road to recovery that motivated the Richardson family to research other Gardasil injured girls.  Their discoveries compelled them to create a documentary powerful enough to prevent this type of travesty from happening to any medical consumer – ever again.

ThinkExist Productions is working in conjunction with two advocacy groups, TruthAboutGardasil.org (http://truthaboutgardasil.org) and S.A.N.E.Vax, Inc.  (http://sanevax.org) to include the history, research, and data both organizations have compiled over the last four years. Combined, the organization’s global networks include concerned activists in 120 countries and every state in the U.S.  In addition to telling the stories of adverse reactions and death, the documentary will also cover the social/political trail of deception over the global mass marketing of the HPV vaccines.

The preview of One More Girl can also be found on http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1995527181/one-more-girl-documentary. Kick Starter – Fund & Follow Creativity is a unique site for film producers and aficionados to preview documentary concepts and donate funds for the completion of the films. This is a new and exciting concept that puts film production back into the hands of the people who appreciate the power of documentary story telling instead of allowing the film industry to determine the nature and content of the message.

One More Girl anticipates the necessary funding will be raised in 90 days and has plans to go into full production the second quarter of 2011.  The documentary release date is tentatively scheduled for the summer of 2012.

ThinkExist Productions,TruthAboutGardasil.org, and SA.N.E.Vax, Inc. plan to market One More Girl globally – and will enter the film into various film festivals. One More Girl promises to be a powerful documentary exposing the truth about HPV vaccines.  

http://www.prlog.org/11212727-truth-behind-hpv-vaccine-travesty-unveiled-in-one-more-girl.html 

One More Girl
Executive Producer: Ryan Richardson
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Media Contact: Leslie Carol Botha
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
www.onemoregirlfilm.com

 

-END-

Date: Friday, 14-Jan-2011 12:06:31

In the face of increasing reports of adverse events and death rates that are 400% higher than other vaccines, Merck continues to maintain that its controversial Gardasil vaccine is safe and continues to push for wider use. One group Merck would especially like to gain approval for is older women (currently, the vaccine is not approved for women over 27 years old). Despite Merck's claims to the contrary, studies have actually shown that Gardasil and its sister vaccine Cervarix (from GlaxoSmithKline) provide no protection for women already exposed to the HPV virus and in fact present highly elevated risks for already exposed women as well as for expectant mothers.

The more sexually active a woman is, the greater the chances she will become exposed to HPV viruses. Likewise, the older a woman is the more sexual encounters she will likely have had and thus the greater the risk of HPV exposure. Information provided for the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) in May 2006 revealed that when the vaccine is administered to a woman with a dormant or harmless form of HPV, the virus can become activated, increasing the likelihood of precancerous lesions developing by a staggering 44.6 percent.

Not one to let negative study results stand in the way of a highly profitable cash cow drug (see Vioxx), Merck decided that the groups in the study were "unbalanced" and played with the figures to eliminate women who were at higher risk to begin with. After the figure juggling the added risk was estimated to be only 11 percent.

Merck initially reported to the FDA that "it is not known whether Gardasil can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman" and continues to downplay risks for expectant mothers. However, studies have shown that pregnant women have a higher risk for adverse reactions, including miscarriages. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has reported 45 cases of spontaneous abortion, or miscarriage, following vaccination with Gardasil. At the time the vaccine was approved, five babies had been born with congenital birth defects after their mothers had been immunized with Gardasil, as opposed to a placebo group that had zero. Later reports put the number of birth defects in the vaccinated group closer to 40.

The risks to already exposed women and expectant mothers are magnified by the fact that there are no screenings recommended for existing HPV viruses or pregnancy – despite clear evidence of increased dangers and no protection. As the small print on the Cervarix product insert states: "Cervarix does not prevent HPV-related lesions in women infected with HPV 16 or HPV 18 at the time of vaccination and has not been shown to have a therapeutic effect."

As previously reported, Merck’s studies on Gardasil safety have been skewed from the outset due to using a “loaded” placebo. Instead of a normal saline solution, Merck removed only the HPV virus from their vaccine and thus used a placebo which contained such dangerous components as aluminum, polysorbate 80 and sodium borate.

See: http://www.tbyil.com/Gardasil_Deception.htm

Merck's promotion and defense of Gardasil are reminiscent of their previous blockbuster drug Vioxx. It took years and ultimately upwards of 60,000 deaths before Vioxx was finally pulled from the market. During the same time Merck was touting Vioxx's safety, it was also hiding and doctoring negative study results and paying doctors for signatures on papers ghost-written by Merck.

What you won’t see Merck reporting is the fact that nearly all cases of HPV are actually self-limiting. In other words, unless there is a weakened immune system, the body fixes HPV viruses all by itself.

See also:

"Merck Sponsored Study Returns Dubious Gardasil Autoimmune Safety Results"
http://www.tbyil.com/Merck_Gardasil_Study.htm

"What is Wrong with the Gardasil Girls? Amy's Story"
http://www.tbyil.com/Amys_Story.htm

"The journey of a Gardasil victim's mother from trusting vaccines to vaccine activist"
http://www.tbyil.com/Vaccine_Victim_Mom_Activist.htm

 

(NaturalNews) Many "scientific" studies are literally nonsense. This is not a conspiracy theory. For example, the Journal of the American Medical Association [2005;294(2):218–28] published a paper showing that one-third of "highly cited original clinical research studies" were eventually contradicted by subsequent studies. The supposed effects of specific interventions either did not exist as the original studies concluded, or were exaggerated. It is not unusual for the "science" of today to degenerate into tomorrow's fiction.

Vaccine studies are often funded by vaccine manufacturers. The lead authors of important studies that will be used to validate the safety or efficacy of a vaccine are often beholden to the manufacturer in some way. They may own stock in the company or are paid by the manufacturer to travel around the country promoting their vaccines. Lead authors may receive consultation fees, grants or other benefits from the drug maker. Although many people consider this unethical or corrupt, in the world of immunizations this is an acceptable practice, condoned by the CDC and FDA.

Sometimes study conclusions contradict core data in the study. It is not uncommon to read the abstract or summary of a major paper touting a vaccine's apparent safety or benefits, only to find that upon examining the actual paper, including important details, the vaccine is shown to be dangerous and may have poor efficacy as well. For example, a landmark study published in Pediatrics [2003;112:1039-48] found that cumulative exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines "resulted in a significant positive association with tics" and "increased risks of language delay."

In other words, babies that received two or more vaccines containing mercury showed signs of neurological damage. This crucial information can be found in the body of the study. However, the authors concluded that "No consistent significant associations were found between thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes." Sadly, the media is reluctant to publish anything that challenges the sacrosanct vaccine program. Newspaper articles about vaccines, and reviews of vaccine studies that are published, merely mimic the original spurious conclusions.

Often, important information is missing from a study. For example, the New England Journal of Medicine [2007;356:1915-27] published a paper on the HPV vaccine. It concluded that the vaccine "was highly effective" even though data in the study showed that vaccine efficacy was just 17% against high-grade cervical lesions. However, truly vital information that would help families to make informed vaccine decisions was never mentioned in the paper.

A secret FDA study [VRBPAC Meeting: May 18, 2006] had already found that the HPV vaccine may "enhance cervical disease" in girls who are sexually active prior to vaccination. In other words, the vaccine seems to work best in virgins and may actually increase a young woman's chance of developing cervical cancer if she was previously exposed through sexual intercourse to HPV strains included in the vaccine.

In some instances, study results may be preordained. For example, when the vaccine-autism link became a public concern, vaccine proponents hastened to produce authentic-appearing studies that contradicted genuine data. Years ago, tobacco companies used this very same ploy. They financed numerous bogus studies ostensibly "proving" that cigarettes didn't cause cancer. The real studies got lost in the muddle. Sadly, it's all too easy to obfuscate truth and deceive the public.

Pregnancy%20Awareness%20Ribbon January 24, 2011 - According to a National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC – http://nvic.org) MedAlerts blog entry written in November 2010, the incidents of abortion and still birth events from the HPV4 vaccine, Gardasil supersedes the same event from all other vaccinations.
The research and post was written by Steven M. Rubin, Ph.D., a computer scientist who maintains the online searchable VAERS database, MedAlerts. He has managed this database voluntarily and independent of his official work since 2003 and has worked with the NVIC since 2005. 1.

In his blog entry on MedAlerts, Dr. Rubin states that “It has been suggested that the H1N1 Flu vaccine causes miscarriages. This month, I want to see if the claim is supported by VAERS data.” 2.

Dr. Rubin explains how it is determined whether a VAERS event resulted in a miscarriage. “VAERS uses the MedDRA symptom classification, which organizes all known symptoms at five levels of detail. At the second level of detail is an entry “Abortions and stillbirth” which has under it “Abortion related conditions and complications”, “Abortions spontaneous”, “Stillbirth and foetal death” and “Abortions not specified as induced or spontaneous”. Each of these is further refined into specific symptoms. So it seems that this second-level term (or as it is known in MedDRA, the High-Level Group Term or HLGT) is a valid way to identify miscarriages.”
Abortion stillbirths
 (Click to enlarge photo)



He surmised the data would “surely favor vaccines that have been given for 21 years over those that have been recently introduced, because such vaccines will have been given much more, and so will have produced many more symptoms. In other words, this graph should de-emphasize the H1N1 Flu vaccine, which has existed for just one year. We should see relatively few H1N1-related miscarriage events compared with the “Seasonal” Flu vaccine which has been administered to many more patients.

However, the VAERS data proved him wrong. Dr. Rubin acknowledges the “results are shocking. First of all, the H1N1 Flu vaccine has appeared in miscarriage events more often than almost any other vaccine.

And then he states:

Additional information