Cervical Cancer Vaccine

A vaccine that is claimed to prevent cancer is causing damage that is a precursor to cancer?

Bronwyn Hancock 20 August 2007
Updated 26 July 2008

In due course I will be writing an article about this vaccine, but in the meantime I refer you to this site that has plenty of information including many articles written by others: http://www.visainfo.org.au/

But in addition, just before you go to that other site, here is some very significant information, that has been brought to my knowledge by the discoverer of it:

Naturopath and Iridologist Michael Blake, of Natures Cure Pty Ltd in Dandenong, Melbourne (web site http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/6025) is very concerned at what he has seen in the irises of four girls recently and his conscience will not allow him to stay silent.

In the area of the iris that corresponds to the uterus, in three of the girls he saw tissue damage, and in the fourth he saw drug residue. In each of the four cases, on reporting back to the patient what he was observing, he was informed that the girl had recently received the cervical cancer vaccine. All were virgins.

Tissue damage in the uterus is what he sees in women who have had such things as abortions and prolapses, and can be a precursor to cancer. It can also cause infertility - as it can prevent the embryo from being able to hold on to the uterus wall. It also often results in lack of sensitivity with sexual intercourse, pain, discomfort and/or frequent discharges.

Note that it has already been observed that one of the ingredients in the vaccine, polysorbate 80, has been observed to cause infertility in mice. Add to that borax, which is used to kill ants, add neurotoxic immune system sensitiser aluminium hydroxyphosphate, and directly inject all of that and any viral material (which is not proven to be in a harmless form) past the very important natural lines of defence in the immune system, then what do you think we are asking for, trouble or protection? I can't tell you what to do - you must figure it out for yourself.

Note also that the primary owners of the main pharmaceutical companies, including the manufacturer of this vaccine, are the extremely wealthy and powerful Rockefeller family. It is well documented that this family prefers to work behind the scenes, and they have also expressed a strong belief in population control. David Icke in his book entitled, "... and the truth shall set you free", wrote:

'In 1952, after decades of funding and supporting eugenics, John D. Rockefeller III established his Population Council, which still exists today. This Elite front has been calling for zero population growth in the United States and, in the words of its 1979 annual report: ... "the spread of the zero population movement... in the developed countries." '

In the population control agenda there does seem to be a particular interest in reducing the population of those of what is considered "lesser stock" (see http://www.thinktwice.com/birthcon.htm), yet all sections of the community are encouraged to receive the vaccine, but do you know which schools and localities are getting which batches of vaccine? Something to think about.

By the way, as all other vaccines, no proper placebo-controlled studies have been done with this vaccine. Most so-called placebo groups received an injection of aluminium hydroxyphosphate "and everything else present in the adjuvant", according to the contact researcher for the major trials. A small minority received the same so-called "placebo" but just without the aluminium. Deceptively that placebo was called "saline". Why don't they receive an inactive substance, which is what a placebo is defined to be? Apparently because, in the understanding of this researcher, "In vaccine trials,... (it) is usual, good clinical practice" to include all these toxic ingredients in the so-called "placebo". So what are these researchers (manufacturer-funded, of course) so afraid of, that they will not give a proper placebo to the placebo group? For more detail about the placebo deception, go to Gardasil clinical trials - Placebo - an article by Cynthia A. Janak. (Her web site is http://www.cynthiajanak.com.)

It is a pity that they are not more concerned about the trail of destruction left behind by the vaccine. Here are many case stories: http://womenhurtbymedicine.wordpress.com/. Here is a typical one on video:

http://www.rockymountainnews.com:80/videos/detail/ashley-story/

Also see:- http://www.judicialwatch.org/gardasil and also very importantly, you must read:-