Gardisal Vaccine

Details: Hits: 4589

For those who may be wondering what is happening in light of a coroners report following the death of our daughter Jasmine Renata after Gardasil .

Absolutley nothing . No updates on anything from the coroners office .

I have emailed them to inform them that this is appalling and that if our request for our daughter's tissue samples cannot be tested for vaccine damage here in New Zealand , then a very competent Doctor in Canada is willing to do the tests and that they should arrange to have them sent over to Canada.

But still no response.

It will be one year in September and we have only just found out from a magazine artical that we are unlikely to have any answers this side of this year.

Why did they not inform us of this first .

The coroners office has had nine months to complete tests so why are they stalling us ?

Do they not want to find out as soon as possible if this cervical cancer vaccine is causing deaths and serious health problems to the young girls of New Zealand ?

Shocking !! Will post any updates.

Thanks Rhonda Renata

Details: Hits: 6634

Posted by Leslie Carol Botha

VAERS report #319836-1:

I was diagnosis with Cervical Cancer in April 2008. I have gotten a routine thin pap test each year for the last 8 years. February 2008 was my first abnormal pap smear in my lifetime.

I received the GARDASIL shot in June of 2006 after hearing and reading about its approval by the FDA. I was the first patient my doctor ever gave the HPV vaccination to. I received all three of the shots and completed the HPV vaccination in November of 2006; each given by my doctor. I had my annual pap smear in February of 2007, and like each pap smear before, it came back negative.

When my February 2008 pap smear cam back positive my doctor then did a biopsy which came back with high-grade cells and warranted a Leep procedure. The Leep was performed at a local hospital on March 14, 2008. The pathology results from the Leep came back and showed that within a year of my last normal pap smear and 15 months from the completion of the GARDASIL HPV vaccination, I had full blown cervical cancer.

On May 6th of 2008 I had my second surgery, a Cone Biopsy of my cervix by Dr., an oncologist at Cancer Center. My second surgery was performed at another hospital. I will now have to see my Oncologist every three months and wait to see, not ‘if’, but ‘when’, my cervical cancer returns.

My oncologist would like to do a hysterectomy at this time, but as a 26-year-old who has always wanted children, I have chosen to wait as long as possible before removing my reproductive organs.

As a very health conscious and responsible person, I have always researched health care issues and been good to my body. Thinking it was in my best interest of my health and well being, I received the GARDASIL shot in June 2006.

It was discovered in March of 2008, followed by my first abnormal pap smear, that I have two of the four HPV strains, 16 and 18, that the shot is suppose to prevent, as well as prevent the onset of HPV symptoms.

I now have cervical cancer and I am left wondering what role the GARDASIL HPV vaccination played in the hasty onset of my onset.

According to the FDA documents women who have been exposed to HPV prior to vaccination have a 44.6% increase in getting cervical cancer for Gardasil and 32% for Cervarix.

Testing for HPV prevalence should be required prior to vaccination.

So for those girls who say they did not have any reactions to the vaccine – the drama may yet still unfold. Make sure you follow up with regular pap testing.

Educate before you vaccinate.

Details: Hits: 9181

Annabelle died without making a sound, leaving mom haunted by medical silence.

(Family Photo)

Linda Morin had no idea she entered a nightmare on October 9, 2008. That is the day her beautiful daughter, Annabelle, received her first Gardasil injection at school. In Canada, HPV vaccination is part of the regular immunization schedule, and parents need not be informed when vaccination actually takes place.

Annabelle and her parents had heard about the vaccine two years earlier at a Urology Clinic. They were told this vaccine would prevent their daughter from ever getting cervical cancer and would save her life. They had even discussed it with Annabelle. They believed the vaccine was a good idea.

16 days after her first shot, Annabelle became very confused, was unable to speak and could hardly stand upright. Linda telephoned the Health Service and spoke to a nurse, who said it was not nornal for a girl in full health to have disorders of this kind. She was advised to take her to the Emergency Room.

The symptoms of aphasia, weakness, amnesia, headache and constant vomiting led to hospital admission for observation. Her parents did not know she had been recently vaccinated. Annabelle was to ill to tell anyone.

Annabelle was thoroughly examined. There was no trace of alcohol or drugs in her system. It was clear to her mother that the symptoms were neurological. No one at the hospital asked if Annabelle had been recently vaccinated, even though the medical community knew this vaccination program had recently started in the schools. This was the first error.

Annabelle was released from the hospital and returned to school the next day. She told the school nurse that she had been admitted to the hospital and asked if her health card could be modified to take the circumstances into account. She also informed her teachers in case she experienced the same symptoms again. She wanted to make sure, if the situation repeated itself, she would be transported to the hospital in time. She also wanted to be sure the school was aware of the symptoms, should anyone else experience them.

When a person becomes ill during the course of HPV vaccinations, it is recommended to postpone further injections until the person has recovered. Annabelle did all the right things by communicating with the nursing staff and the teachers. Sadly, no one connected her illness to Gardasil. That was the second error.

24 November 2008, the third and fatal error: Annabelle received her second injection of Gardasil.

15 days later, she decided to have her bath (around 7:00 pm). With a book in her hand to read while bathing, she entered the bathroom. 30 minutes later, her mother was concerned because she heard no sounds from the room. Linda entered the bathroom to find her daughter dead in the bottom of the tub.

Details: Hits: 10216

Would you consent to giving your child a vaccine that caused an increased risk of cancer? That may be exactly what you are doing when you consent to Gardasil.
According to Information the manufacturer of this vaccine presented to the FDA prior to approval, if a person has already been exposed to HPV 16 or 18 prior to injection Gardasil increases the risk of precancerous lesions, or worse, by 44.6%.
That statement bears repeating, if you have been exposed to HPV 16 or 18 prior to injection and take the vaccine, you increase your risk of precancerous lesions, or worse, by 44.6%.

Is this information advertised? No! This information was actually presented to the FDA by Merck. It came from their own safety trials. The FDA did not respond by recommending screening for HPV prior to vaccination. The FDA did not even demand a warning be included in the package insert.

Now, Merck’s research is indicating that Gardasil may also ‘provide cross-protection’ against other strains of HPV that are closely related to HPV 16 and 18. (see this article on Medpage Today) This means prior exposure to these additional strains may pose an increased risk for cervical cancer also, if combined with vaccination.

No one appears to be concerned with the increased risk of vaccination combined with prior exposure, as long as you take the vaccine. You will see no advertisements indicating the possibility of increased risk of the very cancer this vaccine is supposed to help you avoid.

Government officials will not be informed of the potential danger. They will be told HPV is the most common sexually transmitted virus in the country and that it must be eradicated. They will be told this vaccine should be mandatory.

As a consumer, you must protect yourself. If you are sexually active or suspect you may have been exposed to HPV, ask your doctor to screen for HPV prior to taking Gardasil. If he, or she, does not know why, educate them. After all, it is your future at stake.

44.6% increased risk of cervical lesions/cancer; or HPV screening before consenting to vaccination — it is your decision. Please, make it an informed one.

http://www.examiner.com/x-40801-Vaccines-Examiner~y2010m6d30-Warning-Gardasil-may-cause-increased-risk-of-cervical-cancer

Details: Hits: 5702

BY Janine Roberts

WHY IS A NOBEL AWARD BEING GIVEN FOR THIS ON DECEMBER 10TH?

There are two licensed HPV vaccines in the world.

Merck makes Gardasil. It contains proteins said to come originally from four different types

of HPV. By early 2008 over 10 million doses had been distributed, three-quarters of these in

the USA. It is thought to be earning the company over $1 billion a year – at $360 a course of

three injections, far more than is charged for the common vaccines The other is Cervarix,

made by Smith Klein Beecham, which is not yet licensed for use in the USA (as of May 2008).

It contains proteins said to come from 2 different types of HPV. Both vaccines contain

aluminium adjuvants. Both manufacturers recommend that women are still regularly scanned

for cervical cancer – thus the vaccine does not save costs. In fact these scans give women far

better protection than does the vaccine.

On December 10th, a Nobel Prize will be awarded for finding HPV and proving its link to

cervical cancer to Dr Harad zur Hausen. However this is a missing link in this – for he failed

to find a way to persuade cells to make his virus.

“THE VACCINE WITHOUT A VIRUS.”

Measles, mumps, rubella, and polio – all the usual childhood vaccines are produced from

cell cultures – for viruses are products of cells. But there is something very different about

the HPV vaccines. Unlike all the usual vaccines, they do not contain any virus.

Extraordinarily, at no point during vaccine production is the HPV virus claimed to be

present. The reason for this is very simple. So far scientists have failed to persuade any cell

culture to produce this virus, even cultures made of cervical cancer cells. A statement by the

International Agency for Research on Cancer reported that this type of virus, the

papillomaviruses (HPV), “cannot be propagated in tissue culture.” So far this virus is only

said to be produced by ‘cloning” – i.e. by being made in a laboratory.

Rather these vaccines are the product of a new synthetic vaccine industry based, not on

isolating viruses, but on reproducing short lengths of genetic codes postulated to come from

proteins that once formed the outer coat of the virus that is not itself found for the vaccines.

Extremely sensitive new tests, variants of a laboratory tool called PCR or Polymerase

Chain Reaction, make it possible to study very small fragments of genetic code found among

broken up cellular material. In this case, what are searched for are fragments of codes for

certain protein molecules. These are presumed to come from the outer coating of HPV – and

the vaccine is based on manufactured versions of these proteins.

They seem to assemble naturally into “virus like” empty shells and are thus known

officially as “Virus-Like Particles’ (VLP), even thou’ this is like calling a brick a house. To

make Gardasil, these are put into cells and multiplied in yeast cell cultures, or in baculovirus

cultures for Cervarix. Fluid from the culture containing these particles is then used as the

vaccine. The vaccines are thus certain to contain many particles from the yeast fungi or

baculovirus, and whatever additives are used - and thus Gardasil is not officially

recommended to those who are sensitive to yeast.

The HPV vaccines have then added to them aluminum chemicals as an ‘adjuvant’. This is

to provoke our immune cells into producing antibodies for longer – although it has recently

been discovered that many people have become seriously ill because of this aluminum. 1 The

aluminium is in the form of tiny sharp needle-like crystals. These our immune cells attempt to

digest, but they cannot. The needles remain stuck inside. No wonder our cells respond for

longer.

Nav view search

Navigation

Gardisal Vaccine

RHONDA RENATA STILL WAITING FOR CORONER'S REPORT

CERVICAL CANCER TWO YEARS AFTER GARDASIL

VAERS report #319836-1:

GARDASIL AND LINDA MORIN, FIGHTING THE SILENCE

WARNING, GARDASIL MAY CAUSE 46.4% INCREASED RISK OF CERVICAL CANCER

THE HPV VACCINE MYSTERIES - MUST READ